child abuse, brisbane, australia, rape, stop crime, coverup, justice project


 Logged in as:
 Guest



Managed using:
Free Content Management System Free CMS

Free Content Management

Child Abuse Home
Login/Logout
What They Did To A Girl In Care 2
The Shreddergate Archive
More Stuff
Pollies
Updates
Abuse of Children In Care
Abuse at John Oxley Youth Detention Centre
What They Did To A Girl In Care
What They Did To A Girl 2
Picture Gallery
Heiner Inquiry
The Shredding
Rule of Law and Destruction of Evidence
Alleged Victim Sues State
Contacts
Public Officials Can Still Be Charged
Rape News Story 1
Rape News Story 3
Rape News Story 2
Victorian Government
Officials Could Have Been Charged
Action Against Shredders Reconsidered
Politicians Shy
Responses from Politicians
The MP Letter
Credibility of DPP Office
The Rule of Law
What The CJC Said
History Of Abuse
One More Rape
Abuse at Neerkol
Sins Of The Father
Survivors Tell Their Stories
Shredding Story Overview
Torture
NeverTouch A Nun
The Cat And The Whip
Sin Sweat And Sorrow
DPP Contradicts Opinion Of Predecessor
Access To Truth Denied
Victim Letters
Lives of Children At Risk
Abuse at Nazareth House
The Torment Of Bobbie Ford
Abuse at Silky Oaks
Shreddergate Archive
Former DPP on s129
Welford Response
CMC on s129
No Legal Basis For Shredding
Denial Of Access To Be Investigated
Mysterious Death And The John Oxley Connection
Decade-long Farce Laid Bare
Woman Does Time - But Others Go Free
Court Records Not Available
Mysterious Death Update
House of Reps Crime Inquiry
Newspaper Article
Morris Howard Extract
Morris Howard Findings
Senate Move For New Inquiry
Site Search
EzyEdit User Guide
About EzyEdit
Beginnings
Death Mystery to CMC
Vote Postponed
Mystery Death Not Misconduct for CMC
The Independent Monthly
February 2004
March 2004
Judge buries shredding excuses
2003
Cover Up - Whitewash
Senate Inquiry
April 2004
May 2004
Attorney General Backflip
More John Oxley Outrage
August 2004
The Death Theats
A Needless Rape
September 2004
October 2004
December 2004
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005

Victim's Letters

Handcuff Girl Victim Of Improper Relationship

By Bruce Grundy (April 2000)

A girl in care at the John Oxley Youth Centre at the time an inquiry into the centre was aborted inquiry was the victim of an improper relationship with one of her carers that has been described as "a profound violation of statutory requirements and professional codes of conduct".

The girl was also the victim of inhumane punishment in the Centre. She was handcuffed overnight in the open to a tennis court.

The writer has seen copies of letters written to a staff member at the John Oxley Centre by the girl who suffered the handcuffing punishment.

At the time the letters were written the girl was in her early teens, had been transferred to the Wolston Park psychiatric hospital and was on remand awaiting trial for a serious offence. In addition to some personal, affectionate comments directed to her carer, the girl made a number of remarks critical of the detention centre and its manager.

She said one of the letters she had written to her carer had been discovered and photocopied and she recalled that he had written a letter to her.

Shortly before the handcuffing incident a senior departmental official noted on an internal memorandum that a staff member at the centre who had written a letter to "a 14-year-old girl in care" should have been the subject of disciplinary action.

No disciplinary action was taken against the carer. Instead it was recommended that he be given permanent employment and his salary increments approved.

Child welfare advocate and lecturer in Human Services at the Queensland University of Technology, Ross Daniels, said children in institutional care were highly vulnerable.

"In such circumstances any improper relationship between an officer and a juvenile in care must be regarded as extremely serious and disturbing."

He said any such relationship was a "profound violation of statutory requirements and professional codes of conduct".

It is now also known that later, when the girl was given weekend release prior to completing her sentence, she spent the time with the carer concerned.

She was seventeen.

After her release she lived with the man for some time. They have now separated.

Top


ezyEdit - ASP Website Portal

1462 page visits
Content Management Software 2008